After almost a year-long effort to sell the company as a whole or in parts comes the determined Sunil Mittal of Bharti Airtel Ltd with his deep pockets and ambitious plans to finally capture Africa. It’s a nice story that all we beaten down investors want to believe, for sure there’s the unquestionable interest, but what assurance do we have that it will go through? Sadly none.
Kuwait’s Mobile Telecommunications Co., or Zain, and India’s Bharti are set to hold exclusive negotiations until March 25th and by then the final decision will be made. There’s no guarantee the transaction will be consummated, as it remains subject to due diligence and regulatory approval.
It’s worth mentioning that the unsuccessful fate of the Bharti-MTN deal was a result of regulatory hurdles set by the South African government’s treasury. According to sources, the South African government’s pension fund, Public Investment Corp, holds a 21% stake in MTN, where the government was under intense pressure to not give a go-ahead to the deal on concerns that MTN’s South African identity, post the deal, would be lost. The treasury insisted that for the deal to go through, the potential merged company should remain domiciled in South Africa and should be listed in both companies, something that was not a possibility under existing Indian laws.
While there seems to be no regulatory threats in Kuwait, shareholder concerns at both Bharti and Zain create obstacles and could yet stop the deal. In India, there is the concern of overpaying as Bharti’s stock price plunged in the last trading sessions breaking support levels. In Kuwait, there is the notion of strategic divergence and the threat of unattractive growth going forward. Not to mention the Zain-Nigeria controversy following the announcement of Econet’s CEO Strive Masiyiwa that Bharti Airtel’s acquisition of Zain’s African assets must exclude the Nigerian unit until an ownership dispute with Econet Wireless Holdings Ltd. is resolved. Zain-Nigeria is an important part of the deal, as it accounted for 16% of group revenues in the nine months to 31 September 2010.
The promising and attractively low penetration levels across Africa (30-50%) might make the deal for Bharti a value trap as Zain has been struggling to deliver value to its shareholders with a 65 million subscriber base that only contributed 15% to the groups net profit. Africa still needs a lot of capital investment as competition intensifies and the average revenue per user (ARPU) has been falling. For example, Nigeria saw ARPU fall by one-third, while revenue and EBITDA drop 17% on a year-on-year basis. Similarly, DRCongo saw ARPU fall from $11 to $8 as a result of higher usage tax and a local recession, with revenues and EBITDA falling 13% and 14% respectively.
Tags: Bharti, Bharti Airtel, Zain, Zain Africa Sale



[...] Original post: Zain Sale: Remember That It's Only an “Offer” « Alpha Dinar … [...]
Thanks Sal for reminding the public, including me, of this crucial point. Everyone seems to think that it is a “done deal”. While it may be very close to that, you never know what is going to happen during negotiations.
Overall, I believe that former CEO, Dr. Saad Al-Barack, saw potential in this market. However, he is a few years early. Africa is still developing and it may be a flourishing market in the next couple of decades; As for now, Asia and South America are the places “to be” for anything business.
[Reply]
Sal Reply:
February 17th, 2010 at 8:39 am
I concur, it seems that either everyone in Kuwait is playing the trend “buy the rumor and sell the fact” or is certain that it’s a done deal.Everyone has to realize that Zain ex. Africa isn’t the Zain of today.
[Reply]
Laocowboy2 Reply:
February 17th, 2010 at 10:22 am
I am no expert on Latin America but from what i have read the mobile telephony spaces in both Asia and latin America are already pretty crowded with both well established regional players and the MNCs Unless you are going to pay up for a major acquisition in these markets, Africa is probably all that there is left to play for. It is not an industry in which I would invest any more, anywhere. It eats cash in the network build out phase, has low barriers to entry unless the local government erects them, and ARPUs move only one way as tariff wars erode margins.
[Reply]
They had 5 years to make it perform and it didn’t. And with that debt, they can’t hold it anymore.
Besides, Zain’s expenses are bloated. typical of a business that was a monopolisitc cash cow for the owners…. now its reality times…
I think after selling the african business (if it happens, am still very doubtful especially at this rich multiple) the will focus on cutting the costs (the Saudi business isn’t that great either)…and that wont’ be pretty either
[Reply]
Keynesian Reply:
February 17th, 2010 at 3:35 pm
Excellent points.. You nailed it..
[Reply]
Chinese investors,anyone?
I guess they are waiting, why? They know the sellers are distressed !!
[Reply]