Correlation Between the World's Tallest Buildings and Economic Downturns

February 15, 2009 by Saud

 

Economist Andrew Lawrence came up with the Skyscraper’s Index which shows the correlation between the construction of the world tallest buildings and economic cycles. His thesis is that in years in which the tallest building is complete or near completion, the economy downturns. To me it seems really odd and I can’t find any reason behind this correlation or coincidence; I guess this is what they call in regression analysis a Spurious Correlation, where observation are correlated completely by chance.

 

 

 


Building Completed Name of Building Location Hight Stories Economic Downturn
1908 Singer New York 612 ft. 48 Panic of 1907
1909 Metropolitan New York 700 ft. 50 Panic of 1907
1912 Woolworth New York 792 ft. 57 -
1929 40 Wall Street New York 927 ft. 71 Great Depression
1930 Chrysler New York 1,046 ft. 77 Great Depression
1931 Empire State New York 1,250 ft. 102 Great Depression
1972/3 World Trade Center New York 1,368 ft. 110 1070s stagflation
1974 Sears Tower Chicago 1,450 ft. 110 1070s stagflation
1997 Petronas Kuala Lumpur 1,483 ft. 88 East Asian
2009 Burj Dubai Dubai 2,684 ft. 167 Global Financial Crises
2012* Shanghai Shanghai 1,509 ft. 94 China?

 

 

* I’m not sure whether Burj Dubai will actually be completed or not, so who knows maybe Shanghai building will be the tallest building by 2012.

 

3038figure1

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

9 Responses to “Correlation Between the World's Tallest Buildings and Economic Downturns”

  1. keynesian09 says:

    I really think there is a relationship. When an economy overextends and there is nothing else to do that build the tallest building; that surely tells u that they peaked and are ready to burst the bubble!

    [Reply]

  2. Oikonomia says:

    yeah well the tallest building represents over confidence and growth in an economy and that usually is in the peak of the economic cycle. Notice the location and year the building is completed it was right after a high growth in that country and usually after such growth you have no where else to go other than down the cycle.

    Again, to me tallest building represents over confidence; and over confidence represents peaks.

    “We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet

    But that doesn’t mean that if u build the tallest building the economy will crash :P

    [Reply]

  3. Mean Mister Mustard says:

    What about Taipei 101?

    [Reply]

  4. frankl says:

    bible had tower of babel (likely built in iraq zone, if it was ever real), but i am puzzled that there is not some other correlation to largest ship of an era, large mines (or other holes in the ground), large dams, large bridges – in effect anything that requires large leverage to commence (and the lender must therefore be confident or a fool (and perhaps both!))

    [Reply]

  5. [...] Correlation Between the World’s Tallest Buildings and Economic Downturns «  (Alpha Dinar) [...]

  6. [...] Correlation Between the World’s Tallest Buildings and Economic Downturns « Alpha Dinar- talki… [...]

  7. Jeff Silverman says:

    NYSE building built in 1922, (timed with commodity boomlet) expanded in 1969 when stocks were ready to top for 12 years. (There was so much business in 68-69 the stock market was closed on Wednesday to clear up paperwork and roughly 80% of Harvard B. School grads went into Investment Banking. Chicago Board of trade building built in 1930. Good times and confidence are key pre-requisites for large scale buildings. Huge investments and the requisite credit expansion create inflationary commodity demand which ultimately sows the seeds of higher interest rates, tight money and market downturns.

    [Reply]

  8. [...] perhaps more time on their hands than sense, has identified a fool-proof econometric correlation:  Correlations Between the World’s Tallest Buildings and Economic Downturns – now that’s scientific evidence if ever I saw [...]

  9. [...] Burj is seen by some as a symbol of excess and a proof that supports Economist Andrew Lawrence’s Skyscraper’s Index. Ironically, the inauguration which is expected to have cost less that last year’s $24 million [...]

Leave a Reply